By: Zulmaire González and Juancarlos Vargas
Venezuelans started to hear of Nicolás Maduro when
he was elected Representative to the National Constituent Assembly in 1999.
Later, once the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela was
enacted, he was elected Representative to the National Assembly and became
president of this legislative body in 2005. In 2006, he was appointed Minister
of the Popular Power for Foreign Affairs; in this post, he stood out for
successfully implementing Hugo Chávez’ foreign policy. Some of his achievements
are the creation and, in some cases, the strengthening of new forms of regional
integration such as ALBA, CELAC, PETROCARIBE, Venezuela’s admission to
Mercosur, normalization of the relations between Venezuela and Colombia,
strengthening of relations with non-traditional allies such as the People
Republic of China, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Belorussia and Russia.
In 2012, Maduro was designated Executive
Vice-president by Hugo Chávez, and in December of that year he was anointed as
his political heir with the clear mission of maintaining and deepening the
socialist revolution begun fourteen years ago. After Hugo Chávez’ physical
disappearance, Maduro was appointed and legitimized as Acting President of the
Republic by a Sentence of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court of
Justice dated March 8, 2013, which made a strained interpretation of Article
233 in order to: 1) justify Maduro being the Acting President instead of the
President of the National Assembly, as established in the above-mentioned
article of the Constitution: 2) not having to remove himself from the office of
President in Charge at the time of posting himself as candidate; and 3) being
granted all the powers pertaining to elected presidents, among them that of
Commander in Chief of the National Armed Forces.
During the one hundred and twenty days that Maduro
has been heading the Venezuelan government, he has obsessively resorted to the
use of Chávez’ figure –to whom he refers in the present tense– by stating that
he is still Venezuela’s President. Maduro insistently mentions Chávez in his
speeches and has named him 3,456 times in the 16 days elapsed since his death.
Maduro conducted an extravagant funeral where he even posed the idea of
embalming Chávez’ body and compared him to Communist leaders such as Lenin, Mao
Zedong and Ho Chi Minh. The use of terms such as “father”, “giant”, “Christ of
the Latin American poor”, among others, is very frequent.
Likewise, Maduro has shown devotion and admiration
for Fidel Castro and the Cuban regime. This has become patent by a speech
ringing with praises for Cuba; by wearing on his lapel the five-pointed star
after Castro’s usage and then the olive-green military uniform; by playing –and
singing– the Cuban national anthem in a nationwide broadcast, and uttering this
famous phrase “maybe only the Cuban people possess a solidarity lineage higher
than the one Chávez cultivated in this people” (alluding to Venezuelans).
These expressions towards Cuba illustrate Maduro’s
intention of awarding the Castro brothers greater importance in internal
Venezuelan political decisions, which configures a clear assault against
national sovereignty.
From the religious point of view, Maduro shows a
marked eclecticism since besides his mentioned devotion to Sai Baba, he has not
hesitated to declare himself a Christian and at the same time declares it is a
compliment to be called a Communist. In addition, he alternates messages of
love and unity with resentment, hate and even homophobic allusions like when he
insinuated that the opposing candidate Henrique Capriles Radonski is homosexual
just because he is single.
On the other hand, Nicolás Maduro’s speech has
characterized itself by the use of expressions that denote a position contrary
to the U.S. Government. He started as head of government by declaring two
military American attaches accredited by the Venezuelan government as personae non gratae, insinuating that Chávez’ illness had been provoked by
“the empire”, and accusing the U.S. of being “crazy hawks” that interfere with
the Venezuelan electoral process by ordering “the Venezuelan right to withdraw
from the elections or sabotage them.”
The above indicates that the present Acting
President of Venezuela and presidential candidate Nicolás Maduro has shown
signs of having a personality with fanatical traits that have been reflected in
his policies, actions and speeches. The individual anointed by Hugo Chávez
Frías as his political heir has been obsessively using Chávez image that he
imitates for political purposes. Additionally, he shows devotion to Fidel
Castro and the Cuban regime, which could give rise to Cuban interventionism in
Venezuelan political decisions. Add to this that Maduro is obsessed with the
use of an outdated, anti-American speech, typical of the bi-polar scheme era.
All this leads to the conclusion that the Acting President of the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela with his clear traits of fanaticism represents a risk for
the Venezuelan democracy, the stability of the region, the applicability and
validity of human rights, and national sovereignty.
If we based all of our assessments of politicians solely on the rhetoric contained in their speeches we would be in real trouble, and probably not worthy to participate in the democratic process. Despite Maduro's obvious love for Chavez, I am sure we can all understand that it serves a political purpose rather than a display of pure fanaticism.It is sometimes easy for people to hold on to these statements rather than look at what is actually happening.
ResponderEliminar